Mukhlof Calls Colombia's Recognition of Israeli Sovereignty over Golan "Null and Void"

Egyptian security researcher Mohamed Makhloof declared Colombia's announcement legally void, emphasizing that no attempt to impose Israeli sovereignty on the occupied Syrian Golan has validity under international law.

Legal Rejection and Break with Expansionist Illusions

Mohamed Makhloof, a journalist and specialist in Egyptian national security affairs, described the Colombian step as a decision devoid of real effect, considering the Golan as pure Syrian land where occupation cannot legitimize its presence under any circumstances.

Makhloof noted that sovereignty is not acquired by force nor solidified by transient political changes, affirming that fragmented diplomatic stances are incapable of creating rights in others' lands or altering existing borders under entrenched international treaties.

Arab Consensus and Decisive Historical Background

The Egyptian response coincided with widespread Arab condemnations from the Arab League and Egypt, which rejected the decision as contrary to international legitimacy, particularly UN Security Council Resolution 497 issued in 1981, which declared the imposition of Israeli laws on the 1967-occupied area null and void.

The researcher warned that Netanyahu's expansionist policies threaten regional stability and undermine the international system, believing Arab peoples will not accept "falsifying history" or a logic of force that leads the region toward miscalculated confrontations.

Conclusion: The Golan remains a resolute Arab principled issue, where all international references confirm that occupation does not generate legitimacy, and any unilateral recognition remains an empty letter that does not touch the legal and geographical reality of Syrian land.